🩺What is Acute Kidney Injury?
Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault equation is the standard method for assessing renal function specifically for the purpose of medication dosing. The Cockcroft-Gault equation was developed by Donald Cockcroft and Henry Gault in 1976 based on 249 hospitalized men whose 24-hour measured creatinine clearance was compared to easily obtainable clinical variables. The equation predicts CrCl in mL/min as an absolute value — not normalized to body surface area — which is precisely what makes it clinically useful for drug dosing. The rationale for using CrCl rather than eGFR for drug dosing stems from fundamental differences in how these values are derived and reported. eGFR equations (CKD-EPI, MDRD) are normalized to a standard body surface area of 1.73 m², which adjusts for body size. While this normalization is appropriate for comparing kidney function across individuals, it can misrepresent actual drug clearance in patients whose body size differs significantly from the standard. A patient with a BSA of 2.2 m² (large individual) will have higher absolute CrCl than their normalized eGFR suggests, and a patient with BSA of 1.2 m² (small individual) will have lower absolute CrCl. Since drug clearance depends on the absolute, not normalized, kidney function, CrCl is preferred for individualizing doses. The regulatory importance of Cockcroft-Gault cannot be overstated. The FDA Guidance for Industry on Pharmacokinetics in Patients with Impaired Renal Function explicitly recommends Cockcroft-Gault CrCl for defining renal impairment categories in drug studies. Consequently, virtually every drug label that includes renal dosing guidance uses CrCl thresholds — typically ≥90, 60-89, 30-59, 15-29, and <15 mL/min. The equation has been validated across diverse populations for drug dosing applications, though its accuracy is affected by extremes of body weight. In obese patients (BMI >30), adjusted body weight is often recommended. In the elderly, the equation may overestimate renal function in malnourished individuals due to low muscle mass and creatinine production. Despite these limitations and the development of more accurate GFR estimating equations, Cockcroft-Gault maintains its position as the regulatory gold standard for renal drug dosing.
📊Clinical Assessment & Risk Scoring
Healthcare professionals use these validated clinical calculators, diagnostic scales, and risk scoring systems to assess the severity, prognosis, or therapeutic dosing requirements for Acute Kidney Injury:
Creatinine Clearance & Renal Dosing Calculator
Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault equation is the standard for renal drug dosing guidance in clinical practice.
Creatinine Clearance (Cockcroft-Gault) Calculator
The Cockcroft-Gault formula estimates creatinine clearance (CrCl) from serum creatinine, age, weight, and sex. It is the most widely used equation for medication dosing in renal impairment.
Fractional Excretion of Sodium (FENa) Calculator
The Fractional Excretion of Sodium (FENa) is a key diagnostic test in acute kidney injury (AKI) that helps differentiate prerenal azotemia from intrinsic renal failure. It measures the percentage of filtered sodium that is excreted in the urine.
BUN/Creatinine Ratio Calculator
The BUN to creatinine ratio is a simple clinical tool used to differentiate between prerenal causes of acute kidney injury (dehydration, volume depletion, CHF, GI bleeding) and intrinsic renal causes.
AKI KDIGO Staging Calculator
The KDIGO AKI Staging system classifies acute kidney injury severity based on serum creatinine changes and urine output criteria, guiding clinical management and prognostication.
🧬Diagnostic Logic & Scoring Breakdown
The Cockcroft-Gault equation: CrCl = [(140 - Age) × Weight] / (72 × SCr) × (0.85 if female). Each variable represents a distinct and important physiological component. Age: The (140 - Age) term captures the age-related decline in renal function. In a 20-year-old, this term equals 120; in an 80-year-old, it is 60 — halving CrCl from aging alone. This reflects the progressive reduction in nephron mass, renal blood flow, and GFR that occurs with normal aging at approximately 0.5-1 mL/min/year decline after age 40. Weight in kilograms: Weight is included because creatinine production is proportional to muscle mass, which correlates with body weight. A 100 kg patient generates approximately twice as much creatinine daily as a 50 kg patient with similar muscle composition. For the same serum creatinine, the larger patient will have a proportionally higher CrCl because they produce more creatinine and thus must clear more to maintain the same serum concentration. Constant 72: The denominator constant 72 was empirically derived to scale the relationship between the numerator and serum creatinine. It reflects the average creatinine production rate per kilogram of body weight in the original study population. If the constant were different, the equation would systematically overpredict or underpredict CrCl. Serum creatinine in the denominator: SCr appears in the denominator, establishing the core inverse relationship — as creatinine doubles, CrCl halves (assuming stable renal function). This relationship is the basis of all creatinine-based kidney function estimates. The precision of the equation depends critically on accurate, preferably IDMS-calibrated, creatinine measurement. The 0.85 female correction factor: Women have approximately 15% lower creatinine production than men of equivalent age and weight due to lower muscle mass. Without this correction, women would have systematically lower creatinine and therefore falsely elevated CrCl. The factor is multiplicative and applied after the main calculation. The result is a single number in mL/min representing the estimated volume of plasma that the kidneys can clear of creatinine per minute. Normal values range from approximately 100-140 mL/min in young men and 85-125 mL/min in young women. For drug dosing, CrCl values are categorized into renal function strata. Clinicians should note that children under 18, pregnant women, and patients with cirrhosis or amputation are not well-represented in the Cockcroft-Gault validation studies, and alternative methods (e.g., Schwartz equation for children, measured CrCl for cirrhosis) should be considered in these populations. Additionally, when converting from μmol/L creatinine to mg/dL, divide by 88.4, and when converting weight from pounds to kilograms, divide by 2.2.
📢Clinical Significance & Implications
CrCl estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault equation plays a uniquely critical role at the intersection of nephrology and clinical pharmacology. It is the regulatory standard for renal drug dosing, as codified in the FDA Guidance for Industry and recognized by regulatory agencies worldwide including the European Medicines Agency and the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency of Japan. This means that when a pharmaceutical company develops a new drug that is renally eliminated, they must establish dosing recommendations indexed to Cockcroft-Gault CrCl thresholds. This regulatory framework creates a clinical imperative: physicians must use Cockcroft-Gault to correctly apply the dosing information in drug labels. The clinical impact of incorrect renal dosing is substantial. Underdosing a renally cleared antibiotic such as vancomycin in a patient with CKD can lead to subtherapeutic levels, treatment failure, and development of resistance. Overdosing, on the other hand, can cause drug toxicity — for example, enoxaparin accumulation in renal impairment increases bleeding risk; metformin accumulation can cause lactic acidosis; and morphine accumulation leads to respiratory depression. CrCl-guided dosing is essential across virtually all fields of medicine. In infectious disease, CrCl determines dosing of aminoglycosides (gentamicin, tobramycin), vancomycin, beta-lactams (cefepime, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam), fluconazole, acyclovir, valacyclovir, ganciclovir, and tenofovir. In oncology, carboplatin dosing uses the Calvert formula, which requires CrCl. Methotrexate, cisplatin, topotecan, and bleomycin all require renal dose adjustment. In cardiovascular medicine, CrCl determines enoxaparin dosing, influences DOAC selection (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban), and guides use of spironolactone and digoxin. In endocrinology, metformin is contraindicated at CrCl <30, and SGLT2 inhibitor dosing varies by CrCl. In neurology, gabapentin, pregabalin, and levetiracetam require CrCl-based dose adjustment. In pain management, morphine, meperidine, and tramadol accumulate in renal impairment. The KDIGO 2024 guidelines recognize the importance of CrCl for drug dosing and recommend consulting drug-specific prescribing information for dose adjustments. They also highlight important considerations: using actual body weight in Cockcroft-Gault for patients with normal BMI, considering adjusted body weight for obesity, and understanding that CrCl overestimates true GFR in advanced CKD due to tubular creatinine secretion, which is particularly relevant when dosing narrow-therapeutic-index drugs.
💡 Clinical Assessment Scenario Example
A 78-year-old woman weighing 62 kg (height 165 cm, BMI 22.8) with type 2 diabetes and chronic neuropathic pain presents for medication review. Her serum creatinine is 1.3 mg/dL, stable over the past 3 months. Her current medications include metformin 1000 mg twice daily, lisinopril 20 mg daily, atorvastatin 20 mg daily, and gabapentin 600 mg three times daily. She reports mild sedation, which may be due to gabapentin accumulation. The clinician decides to evaluate her renal function for drug dosing. Cockcroft-Gault calculation: Age = 78, so (140 - 78) = 62. Weight = 62 kg. Numerator = 62 × 62 = 3,844. SCr = 1.3 mg/dL, so denominator = 72 × 1.3 = 93.6. Unadjusted CrCl = 3,844 / 93.6 = 41.1 mL/min. Since female, apply 0.85 factor: 41.1 × 0.85 = 34.9 mL/min, round to 35 mL/min. This is moderate renal impairment (CrCl 30-59). Implications for her medications: 1) Gabapentin is primarily renally eliminated. At CrCl 35 mL/min, the recommended dose is 300-600 mg twice daily (reduced from three times daily). Her current dose of 600 mg TID is excessive and likely causing sedation. Reduce to 300 mg twice daily or 400 mg twice daily depending on pain control. 2) Metformin can be continued since CrCl >30, but monitor more frequently. Contraindicated if CrCl falls below 30. 3) Lisinopril and atorvastatin do not require dose adjustment at this CrCl. However, monitor potassium and creatinine 1-2 weeks after any dose adjustments. 4) If she develops an infection requiring an antibiotic, avoid nitrofurantoin (ineffective at CrCl <60) and choose a penicillin or cephalosporin with appropriate renal dose adjustment. 5) Avoid NSAIDs for pain management as they can worsen renal function. 6) Educate the patient about medication safety and signs of drug toxicity. Recheck CrCl and electrolytes in 1 month after gabapentin dose reduction to ensure tolerability. If eGFR by CKD-EPI is available, it should be compared — if substantially different, use the Cockcroft-Gault value for drug dosing decisions as specified in the prescribing information. This case demonstrates how CrCl-guided dosing directly impacts patient safety by preventing drug accumulation and toxicity.
💊Common Medications & Interventions
The following pharmacological therapies and substances are commonly referenced or adjusted based on the clinical assessment of Acute Kidney Injury:
⚠️Clinical Assessment Pitfalls
❌ Mistake: Using ideal body weight in Cockcroft-Gault for all patients instead of actual body weight
✅ Correction: Cockcroft-Gault was derived and validated using total body weight. In normal-weight patients, use actual weight. In obesity (BMI >30), consider using adjusted body weight: IBW + 0.4 × (actual - IBW). In cachexia (BMI <18.5), actual weight may underestimate CrCl — consider using ideal body weight instead.
❌ Mistake: Using Cockcroft-Gault in acute kidney injury for drug dosing decisions
✅ Correction: In AKI, serum creatinine is not at steady state, and Cockcroft-Gault may significantly overestimate or underestimate drug clearance. Use the most recent stable CrCl, recheck every 12-24 hours, and consider using pharmacokinetic drug monitoring (e.g., vancomycin troughs, aminoglycoside levels) to guide therapy.
❌ Mistake: Using eGFR (CKD-EPI or MDRD) for drug dosing as a direct substitute for CrCl
✅ Correction: eGFR normalized to 1.73 m² BSA may misestimate drug clearance, especially at extremes of body size. CrCl (Cockcroft-Gault) in mL/min is specified in drug labels for dosing adjustments. If eGFR must be used, prefer CKD-EPI over MDRD, and consider adjusting for BSA: estimated CrCl = eGFR × (patient BSA / 1.73).
❌ Mistake: Assuming drug dosing recommendations are the same for all drugs within a renal impairment category
✅ Correction: Different drugs have different degrees of renal elimination and different therapeutic indices. Always consult the specific prescribing information for each drug. For example, at CrCl 30-59 mL/min, metformin requires caution but can be used, while nitrofurantoin is ineffective and spironolactone increases hyperkalemia risk.
❌ Mistake: Failing to recheck CrCl during acute illness or after initiating nephrotoxic medications in patients with CKD
✅ Correction: Renal function can decline rapidly during intercurrent illness, dehydration, or with nephrotoxic drugs (NSAIDs, IV contrast, aminoglycosides). Recheck CrCl every 24-48 hours in hospitalized patients with CKD. Hold metformin, ACE inhibitors, and diuretics during acute illness with risk of dehydration.
❌ Mistake: Using actual total body weight in obese patients (BMI >30) without adjustment
✅ Correction: Cockcroft-Gault overestimates CrCl when using actual body weight in obesity. For BMI >30, use ideal body weight (IBW) or adjusted body weight: AdjBW = IBW + 0.4 × (Actual - IBW). IBW for men = 50 + 2.3 × (height in inches - 60); for women = 45.5 + 2.3 × (height in inches - 60).
❌ Mistake: Confusing CrCl with eGFR for CKD classification
✅ Correction: CrCl overestimates true GFR by 10-20% due to tubular creatinine secretion. Use eGFR (CKD-EPI) for CKD staging. Use CrCl for drug dosing. These are complementary but not interchangeable for their primary purposes.
❌ Mistake: Using Cockcroft-Gault in acute kidney injury or unstable renal function
✅ Correction: Cockcroft-Gault assumes steady-state renal function. In AKI, serum creatinine is rising and does not reflect steady-state clearance. Use estimated CrCl with caution, check serial values, and consider alternative markers like cystatin C.
❌ Mistake: Not verifying that serum creatinine has reached steady state before applying the equation
✅ Correction: Cockcroft-Gault requires steady-state creatinine — typically 3-5 half-lives after a change in renal function. A rising creatinine overestimates steady-state CrCl, and a falling creatinine underestimates it. Always confirm by examining creatinine trends over 24-72 hours.
❌ Mistake: Applying the 0.85 female correction factor twice or using it in male patients
✅ Correction: The 0.85 factor applies once for female patients only. For males, the factor is 1 (no correction). A common programming error in calculators is applying the factor to both sexes or omitting it entirely in females.
❌ Mistake: Interpreting FENa in patients on diuretics without considering the effect
✅ Correction: Diuretics, especially loop and thiazide diuretics, increase sodium excretion and can falsely elevate FENa even in true prerenal states. Use FeUrea instead: FeUrea <35% suggests prerenal, >50% suggests intrinsic AKI. Alternatively, interpret FENa with caution, recognizing that the value may overestimate the degree of tubular damage.
❌ Mistake: Using FENa in patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease
✅ Correction: In CKD, baseline FENa is often elevated (>1% even in envolemic state) due to compensatory natriuresis in surviving nephrons. This blunts the utility of FENa for AKI differentiation. The test is most useful in AKI without pre-existing advanced CKD (eGFR <30).
❌ Mistake: Relying on a single FENa measurement without clinical correlation
✅ Correction: FENa should never be interpreted in isolation. Always integrate with clinical assessment of volume status (JVP, skin turgor, mucous membranes, orthostatic vitals), urine output trends, urine microscopy (muddy brown casts suggest ATN, hyaline casts suggest prerenal), BUN-to-creatinine ratio, and response to fluid challenge.
❌ Mistake: Misinterpreting FENa in non-oliguric AKI
✅ Correction: FENa is most reliable in oliguric AKI (urine output <400 mL/day). In non-oliguric AKI, FENa may be elevated even in prerenal states. The diagnostic thresholds (<1%, 1-2%, >2%) were established in oliguric patients and may not apply to non-oliguric AKI.
❌ Mistake: Using FENa in contrast-induced nephropathy and rhabdomyolysis
✅ Correction: In both contrast-induced nephropathy and rhabdomyolysis, FENa is often <1% despite intrinsic tubular injury. This is because the primary mechanism involves tubular obstruction rather than impaired sodium reabsorption. FeUrea may be more helpful in these conditions.
❌ Mistake: Using the ratio to definitively diagnose AKI etiology
✅ Correction: The BUN/creatinine ratio is a supportive tool, not a definitive diagnostic test. It must be combined with history, physical exam, urine studies (FENa, urine osmolality), and response to volume expansion for accurate diagnosis.
❌ Mistake: Not using the worst of creatinine OR urine output criteria
✅ Correction: KDIGO staging is based on the worst of either SCr or UO criteria. A patient may meet Stage 3 by UO criteria even if SCr only meets Stage 1. Always assess both.
❌ Mistake: Forgetting that RRT initiation automatically classifies as Stage 3
✅ Correction: Once renal replacement therapy is initiated for AKI, the patient is automatically classified as AKI Stage 3, regardless of the SCr or urine output at that time.
🚑When to Seek Medical Attention
This reference supports clinical assessment of Acute Kidney Injury; it does not replace urgent evaluation. Seek prompt in-person medical care if symptoms are severe, rapidly worsening, or life-threatening, or if you are unsure about a diagnosis or treatment plan. Patients should always consult their physician before starting or changing any therapy.
❓Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What is the difference between CrCl and eGFR?
CrCl (Cockcroft-Gault) includes weight and is reported as an absolute value in mL/min, not normalized to BSA, making it suitable for individual drug dosing. eGFR (CKD-EPI) is normalized to 1.73 m² BSA and is preferred for CKD staging. Use CrCl for drug dosing as per drug labels, eGFR for CKD classification per KDIGO guidelines.
Q: Which body weight should I use for Cockcroft-Gault?
Use actual body weight in Cockcroft-Gault as originally described. For BMI >30, many experts recommend using adjusted body weight: IBW + 0.4 × (actual - IBW). For BMI <18.5, actual weight may underestimate CrCl, and using ideal body weight may be more appropriate.
Q: Why is the 0.85 correction factor used for females?
Females have approximately 15% lower muscle mass than males of similar age and weight, resulting in proportionally lower creatinine production. Without this adjustment, women would have a falsely low serum creatinine for their true GFR, and CrCl would be systematically overestimated.
Q: Is Cockcroft-Gault still the recommended equation for drug dosing?
Yes. The FDA, EMA, and most drug manufacturers continue to specify Cockcroft-Gault CrCl in prescribing information for renal dose adjustment. CKD-EPI eGFR is increasingly considered but has not yet replaced Cockcroft-Gault for drug dosing. Always use the equation stated in the drug label.
Q: How often should CrCl be rechecked in patients on renally cleared medications?
For stable outpatients: every 3-6 months. During acute illness or when renal function may change: every 24-48 hours. Before each dose of certain high-risk drugs (e.g., enoxaparin, vancomycin), verify CrCl is current. Use pharmacokinetic monitoring when available.
Q: What should I do when CrCl and eGFR give discordant values?
Discordance is common, especially in the elderly, obese, and malnourished. For drug dosing, use CrCl as specified in the drug label. For CKD staging, use eGFR. If values are very different, consider using cystatin C to verify and review which equation the clinical scenario best fits. Measure BSA to see if normalization explains the difference.
Q: Are there any drugs where eGFR should be used instead of CrCl for dosing?
Some newer drug labels are transitioning to eGFR thresholds, particularly for SGLT2 inhibitors and direct oral anticoagulants. Always check the specific drug label. When eGFR is specified, use CKD-EPI eGFR. When both are listed, or when unclear, use the more conservative value to ensure safety.
Q: Is Cockcroft-Gault still recommended for drug dosing in the era of CKD-EPI?
Yes. The FDA, European Medicines Agency, and most drug manufacturers specify Cockcroft-Gault CrCl in prescribing information for renal dose adjustment. CKD-EPI eGFR is gaining acceptance but has not replaced Cockcroft-Gault for drug dosing. Always use the equation specified in the drug label.
Q: Should I use actual body weight or ideal body weight in Cockcroft-Gault?
Use actual body weight for most patients. For obese patients (BMI >30), many experts recommend using adjusted body weight: IBW + 0.4 × (actual - IBW). For cachectic patients, actual body weight may lead to underestimation; consider using ideal body weight instead.
Q: How does Cockcroft-Gault differ from measured creatinine clearance (24-hour urine collection)?
Cockcroft-Gault provides an estimated CrCl without requiring urine collection. Measured CrCl requires a timed 24-hour urine collection for both creatinine and volume, which is cumbersome and prone to collection errors. Measured CrCl is sometimes used in research or when estimating equations are unreliable.
Q: Can Cockcroft-Gault be used in patients with cirrhosis and ascites?
Cockcroft-Gault is unreliable in cirrhosis. These patients have reduced muscle mass (lower creatinine production), ascites (weight is not true body mass), and impaired hepatic creatinine synthesis. Measured CrCl or cystatin C-based eGFR is preferred in this population.
Q: How often should CrCl be rechecked during hospitalization?
For stable patients with normal renal function, checking every 48-72 hours is adequate. In critically ill patients, patients receiving nephrotoxic drugs, or those with unstable CrCl, recheck every 24 hours. Always recheck CrCl before administering a renally cleared medication if >48 hours have passed since the last value.
Q: When should I use FeUrea instead of FENa?
Use FeUrea when FENa is unreliable: patients on diuretics (loop, thiazide, or potassium-sparing), those with pre-existing CKD, early AKI stages, or conditions like contrast-induced nephropathy and rhabdomyolysis where FENa may be paradoxically low. FeUrea <35% suggests prerenal; >50% suggests intrinsic AKI.
Q: Can FENa differentiate all types of AKI?
No. FENa primarily differentiates prerenal azotemia from ATN. It does not reliably distinguish between specific intrinsic renal causes such as acute glomerulonephritis (where FENa may be low due to intact tubular function), acute interstitial nephritis (variable FENa), or vascular causes. Urine microscopy, renal ultrasound, and serological testing are needed for further differentiation.
Q: What is the role of FENa in the diagnosis of hepatorenal syndrome?
In hepatorenal syndrome, FENa is typically <1% due to intense renal vasoconstriction and avid sodium retention, mimicking prerenal azotemia. However, these patients do not respond to volume expansion. The diagnosis requires exclusion of other causes of AKI in cirrhosis, and FENa alone cannot distinguish hepatorenal syndrome from prerenal AKI.
Q: How does FENa behave in acute glomerulonephritis?
In acute glomerulonephritis, FENa may be <1% because the primary pathology is glomerular inflammation with reduced GFR, while tubular function remains intact. The tubules therefore reabsorb sodium normally. This can lead to the false impression of prerenal AKI. Urine microscopy showing red cell casts helps differentiate.
Q: What urine sodium concentration alone can tell us vs FENa?
Urine sodium <20 mEq/L suggests prerenal AKI, while >40 mEq/L suggests ATN. However, urine sodium is affected by volume status, diuretics, and CKD. FENa is superior because it normalizes for both serum creatinine and urine creatinine concentration, correcting for variations in GFR and urine concentration.
Q: Can FENa be used in children with AKI?
Yes, FENa can be used in children, but the thresholds differ slightly. In neonates, a FENa >2.5% suggests intrinsic AKI due to higher baseline sodium excretion. In older children, the adult thresholds (<1%, 1-2%, >2%) are generally applicable. As in adults, diuretic use and pre-existing renal disease limit its reliability.
Q: Can the BUN/creatinine ratio be normal in prerenal AKI?
Yes. The ratio may be normal in early or mild prerenal AKI, or in patients with underlying CKD where both BUN and creatinine are already elevated. The ratio is most useful when interpreted as a trend rather than a single value.
Q: What medications affect the BUN/creatinine ratio?
Corticosteroids and tetracyclines increase BUN and may elevate the ratio. Trimethoprim and cimetidine inhibit creatinine secretion and may lower the ratio by increasing serum creatinine without affecting BUN.
Q: What is the difference between KDIGO, RIFLE, and AKIN classifications?
KDIGO (2012) unified the earlier RIFLE (2004) and AKIN (2007) classifications into a single consensus system. Key changes include: a 48-hour window for the 0.3 mg/dL creatinine increase criterion (from AKIN), retention of the 7-day baseline comparison (from RIFLE), urine output criteria harmonized with RIFLE/AKIN, and the addition of eGFR <35 mL/min/1.73m² for patients <18 years.
Q: When should nephrology be consulted for AKI?
Nephrology consultation is recommended for Stage 2 or 3 AKI, when there is no clear etiology, when AKI is associated with a nephrotoxic exposure, when there is concern for glomerulonephritis or interstitial nephritis, when electrolyte disturbances are refractory, or when RRT is being considered. Early consultation (within 24 hours of Stage 2) has been associated with improved outcomes.
Q: Can a patient progress through multiple AKI stages?
Yes. AKI is dynamic and patients can progress or regress through stages. The highest (worst) stage reached during hospitalization is typically used for prognostication. Daily reassessment is recommended to track progression and guide management.
Q: Does oliguria alone qualify as AKI if creatinine is normal?
Yes. The KDIGO criteria explicitly state that urine output criteria alone can diagnose and stage AKI, even in the absence of creatinine elevation. Oliguria (UO <0.5 mL/kg/h for 6h) is often an earlier marker of AKI than creatinine rise.