APACHE II Score Calculator (Simplified)
The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II is a severity-of-disease classification system for ICU patients, providing an estimate of mortality risk based on physiological derangement, age, and chronic health status.
About
The Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score was developed by Knaus, Draper, Wagner, and Zimmerman at George Washington University Medical Center, with the landmark paper published in Critical Care Medicine in 1985. It was designed as a simplified version of the original APACHE system (1981), reducing the number of physiological variables from 34 to 12 to improve clinical practicality while maintaining prognostic accuracy. The APACHE II score comprises three components: the Acute Physiology Score (APS), which assigns points (0-4) to 12 physiological variables based on the worst value within the first 24 hours of ICU admission; age points (0-6 based on age category); and chronic health points (0-5 based on history of severe organ system insufficiency or immunocompromise). The total score ranges from 0 to 71, with higher scores indicating greater severity of illness and higher predicted hospital mortality. The original validation study included 5,815 ICU admissions across 13 hospitals in the United States and demonstrated a strong correlation between rising APACHE II scores and in-hospital mortality. APACHE II has since been validated in hundreds of studies worldwide across diverse ICU populations, including medical, surgical, trauma, and septic patients. It remains one of the most widely used ICU severity scoring systems globally, employed for mortality risk prediction, clinical research stratification, ICU performance benchmarking, and resource allocation. This simplified version presents the physiological variables as categorized dropdown selections for ease of bedside use while preserving the original Knaus scoring system.
Formula
APACHE II = Acute Physiology Score (0-60) + Age Points (0-6) + Chronic Health Points (0-5)
The APACHE II score is the sum of three components: the Acute Physiology Score (APS), age points, and chronic health points. The APS is calculated from 12 physiological variables, each scored from 0 to 4, with higher scores assigned for more extreme deviations from normal. The temperature variable assigns points for hypothermia (<36°C) and hyperthermia (>38.5°C), with extreme values below 30°C or above 41°C scoring 4 points. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) deviation from the normal range of 70-109 mmHg scores points for both hypotension (<70 mmHg) and hypertension (>110 mmHg). Heart rate is scored for both bradycardia and tachycardia, with rates below 40 or above 180 bpm scoring 4 points. Respiratory rate accounts for both bradypnea and tachypnea. Oxygenation is assessed differently depending on FiO2: when FiO2 is 50% or greater, the alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient (AaDO2) is used, and when FiO2 is less than 50%, PaO2 is used directly. Arterial pH is scored for both acidosis and alkalosis. Serum sodium and potassium score for both hypo- and hyper-elevated states. Creatinine scoring is doubled for patients with acute renal failure (defined as a rise in creatinine with oliguria). Hematocrit and white blood cell count complete the 12-variable set. The Glasgow Coma Scale score is subtracted from 15 to derive neurological points (i.e., lower GCS gives higher points). Age points are assigned as follows: <45 years (0), 45-54 (2), 55-64 (3), 65-74 (5), and ≥75 (6). Chronic health points are awarded for severe organ system insufficiency or immunocompromise documented before ICU admission: 2 points for elective postoperative patients and 5 points for nonoperative or emergency surgical patients. The maximum total score is 71. The predicted mortality rate corresponding to APACHE II scores follows a non-linear relationship: a score of 0-4 predicts <5% mortality, 10-14 predicts approximately 15% mortality, 20-24 predicts approximately 40% mortality, 30-34 predicts approximately 70% mortality, and scores above 40 predict >80% mortality. The score is intended to be calculated using the worst physiological values within the first 24 hours of ICU admission, not for serial reassessment.
Score Interpretation
APACHE II is one of the most extensively validated and widely used severity of illness scoring systems in critical care medicine worldwide. It serves multiple important clinical and administrative functions. For individual patient prognostication, the APACHE II score at 24 hours provides an objective estimate of hospital mortality risk that can supplement clinical judgment. The score is particularly useful for stratifying patients in clinical trials, ensuring balanced randomization based on illness severity. APACHE II is also used for ICU performance benchmarking through standardized mortality ratios (SMRs), where the observed mortality of an ICU is compared to the mortality predicted by APACHE II, adjusted for case mix. This allows objective comparisons across different ICUs and over time within the same unit. The score has been incorporated into multiple national ICU audit programs, including the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC) in the UK. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines acknowledge APACHE II as a valid tool for assessing severity in septic patients, though the guidelines note that SOFA is preferred for serial organ dysfunction assessment. The main limitation of APACHE II is that it requires a full 24 hours of data collection before calculation, making it a retrospective rather than real-time assessment tool. It also requires accurate data abstraction of the worst physiological values, which can be resource-intensive and subject to inter-observer variability. The score was developed in 1985, and advances in ICU care since then mean that raw mortality rates for a given APACHE II score have decreased over time, necessitating periodic recalibration. Newer versions (APACHE III and APACHE IV) have been developed with updated coefficients and larger validation databases, but APACHE II remains the most widely used version due to its simplicity and extensive validation. Despite these limitations, APACHE II remains a cornerstone of ICU severity assessment and is routinely used in clinical research, quality improvement, and ICU administration worldwide.
Low Severity — 0–14
APACHE II score <15. Predicted mortality <10%. Low severity of illness.
Management: Continue standard ICU monitoring. Reassess score daily. Plan for step-down when clinically appropriate.
Moderate Severity — 15–25
APACHE II score 15-25. Predicted mortality 10-40%. Moderate severity of illness.
Management: Intensify monitoring and organ support. Consider specialist consultation. Reassess score every 24-48h.
High Severity — 26–71
APACHE II score >25. Predicted mortality >40%. High severity of illness.
Management: Maximize organ support interventions. Urgent multidisciplinary team discussion. Consider referral to tertiary ICU.
Reference Ranges
| Population | Normal Range | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ICU patients | 0-71 points | Higher score = higher mortality |
Dr. Ahmed Ismail
Dr. Ahmed is a pulmonology and critical care consultant with expertise in respiratory physiology and ICU medicine.
View medical review board & editorial policy →Example Calculation
A 70-year-old man with septic shock is admitted to the ICU. The worst physiological values within the first 24 hours are: temperature 39°C (scoring 3 points in the 39-40.9°C range), MAP 55 mmHg (2 points for the 50-69 mmHg range), heart rate 130 bpm (2 points for 110-139 range), respiratory rate 35/min (3 points for 35-49 range), oxygenation PaO₂ 60 mmHg on FiO₂ 0.6 requiring AaDO₂ calculation — approximately 350 mmHg qualifies for 2 points, arterial pH 7.25 (2 points for 7.15-7.24 range), serum sodium 150 mEq/L (1 point for 150-154 range), serum potassium 3.0 mEq/L (1 point for 3-3.4 range), creatinine 2.0 mg/dL with acute renal failure (3 points, doubled to 6 for acute renal failure), hematocrit 28% (2 points for 20-29.9% range), WBC 25,000/mm³ (2 points for 20-39.9 range), and GCS 12 (GCS points derived from 15 - 12, giving 2 points). The APS sum is: 3 + 2 + 2 + 3 + 2 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 6 + 2 + 2 + 2 = 28. Age (65-74 years) adds 5 points. Chronic health points add 5 for nonoperative or emergency surgical status, giving a total APACHE II score of 28 + 5 + 5 = 38. This corresponds to a predicted hospital mortality of approximately 75-85%, placing the patient in the high severity category. This high APACHE II score is consistent with the need for mechanical ventilation, vasopressor support, and intensive multi-organ monitoring in the ICU.
Related Conditions
Related Medications
Common Mistakes
Using worst values from different time periods
Use the worst values within the first 24 hours of ICU admission. All measurements should come from this same 24-hour period, not drawn from multiple days.
Not accounting for FiO₂ in oxygenation scoring
Use AaDO₂ when FiO₂ ≥0.5, and PaO₂ when FiO₂ <0.5. This distinction is critical for accurate oxygenation scoring.
Forgetting to double creatinine points in acute renal failure
When the patient has acute renal failure (rising creatinine with oliguria), the creatinine score must be doubled. This increases the APS weight for renal dysfunction.
Incorrectly deriving GCS points from total score
GCS points are 15 minus the actual GCS score. A GCS of 12 gives 3 points, not the GCS itself. This is a common arithmetic error.
Applying APACHE II in pediatric or neonatal ICU populations
APACHE II was designed and validated for adult ICU patients (≥16 years). Pediatric patients should be assessed using PRISM (Pediatric Risk of Mortality) or PIM (Pediatric Index of Mortality) scores.
Frequently Asked Questions
How is APACHE II different from SOFA?
When should APACHE II be calculated?
What is the maximum APACHE II score?
Can APACHE II be used for individual treatment withdrawal decisions?
What is the role of the chronic health points in APACHE II?
How does the APACHE II score relate to ICU length of stay?
Are there updated versions of APACHE?
References
- Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13(10):818-829. PubMed
- Vincent JL, Moreno R. Clinical review: scoring systems in the critically ill. Crit Care. 2010;14(2):207. PubMed
- Zimmerman JE, Kramer AA, McNair DS, Malila FM. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today's critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(5):1297-1310. PubMed
- Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA, et al. The APACHE III prognostic system: risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest. 1991;100(6):1619-1636. PubMed
- Salluh JI, Soares M. ICU severity of illness scores: APACHE, SAPS and MPM. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014;20(5):557-565. PubMed
- Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F. A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA. 1993;270(24):2957-2963. PubMed
- Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(11):1181-1247. PubMed