تخطى إلى المحتوى / Skip to content

Try TabeebPlus fully for 7 days free!

Evidence Grade Brisk

TIMI UA/NSTEMI Risk Score Calculator for Acute Coronary Syndrome

The TIMI UA/NSTEMI risk score is a validated tool for assessing the risk of adverse cardiac events in patients presenting with unstable angina or non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).

Patient Parameters

Enter the values below to calculate the score.

Patient is 65 years of age or older
Family history, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, smoking, obesity
Prior MI, PCI, CABG, or known coronary stenosis ≥50%
Patient has taken aspirin within the past 7 days
At least 2 anginal episodes in the past 24 hours
ST-segment depression ≥0.5 mm on presenting ECG
Elevated troponin or CK-MB above local upper reference limit

About

The TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) risk score for unstable angina and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction was developed by Antman et al. and published in JAMA in 2000 based on data from two landmark randomized controlled trials: TIMI 11B (which compared enoxaparin to unfractionated heparin) and ESSENCE (which also evaluated enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in unstable angina and NSTEMI). The derivation cohort included 1,958 patients with UA/NSTEMI from TIMI 11B, and the score was validated in 1,952 patients from the ESSENCE trial. The score identifies seven independent predictors of adverse outcomes at 14 days, including age ≥65 years, at least three coronary artery disease risk factors, known coronary artery disease (stenosis ≥50%), aspirin use within the past seven days, severe angina (at least two anginal episodes within 24 hours), ST-segment deviation ≥0.5 mm on presenting ECG, and elevated serum cardiac biomarkers (troponin or creatine kinase MB fraction). Each variable carries equal weight at 1 point, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 7. The 14-day composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, new or recurrent myocardial infarction, or severe recurrent ischemia requiring urgent revascularization ranges from 4.7% for a score of 0-2 to 29.3% for a score of 5-7. The score has been externally validated in multiple populations including community-based cohorts, registries, and clinical trial datasets, with consistent prognostic performance. Its evidence level is Grade B, supported by the original derivation and validation trials as well as subsequent confirmatory studies.

Formula

Age ≥65 (1) + ≥3 CAD Risk Factors (1) + Known CAD (1) + Aspirin in Past 7 Days (1) + Severe Angina (1) + ST Deviation ≥0.5mm (1) + Elevated Cardiac Markers (1)

The TIMI UA/NSTEMI risk score assigns 1 point for each of seven independent clinical variables present at the time of initial evaluation, yielding a total score from 0 to 7. Age ≥65 years contributes 1 point, reflecting the increased vulnerability to adverse outcomes associated with advanced age. The presence of at least three traditional CAD risk factors (family history of premature CAD, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, smoking, or obesity) adds 1 point. Known coronary artery disease — defined as prior angiographic stenosis ≥50%, prior myocardial infarction, prior percutaneous coronary intervention, or prior coronary artery bypass grafting — adds 1 point. Aspirin use within the seven days preceding presentation contributes 1 point, as this identifies patients with more advanced or unstable atherosclerotic disease. Severe angina, defined as two or more anginal episodes within the 24 hours preceding presentation, adds 1 point and reflects ongoing myocardial ischemia. ST-segment deviation of 0.5 mm or more on the presenting ECG (either ST depression or transient ST elevation) contributes 1 point, identifying patients with electrocardiographic evidence of active ischemia. Elevated serum cardiac biomarkers (troponin I or T, or creatine kinase MB fraction above the upper limit of normal) contribute 1 point, reflecting myocardial necrosis. The total score stratifies patients into three risk categories: low risk (score 0-2, 14-day composite event rate 4.7%), moderate risk (score 3-4, event rate 12.5%), and high risk (score 5-7, event rate 29.3%). Each additional point increases the risk of adverse outcomes by approximately 4-5%, demonstrating a clear risk gradient that guides clinical decision-making regarding the intensity of antithrombotic therapy and the timing of invasive coronary angiography.

Score Interpretation

The TIMI UA/NSTEMI risk score is a cornerstone of early risk stratification in acute coronary syndrome management, endorsed by the AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes and the ESC guidelines for NSTEMI. Its clinical utility lies in its simplicity — seven binary variables that can be assessed within minutes of presentation using history, ECG, and initial cardiac biomarker results — and its ability to provide a clear risk gradient that informs therapeutic decision-making. For low-risk patients (score 0-2), the score supports a conservative initial strategy with medical management, serial biomarker monitoring, and non-invasive stress testing before discharge. For moderate-risk patients (score 3-4), the score supports admission with antithrombotic therapy (anticoagulation plus dual antiplatelet therapy) and early invasive coronary angiography within 24-48 hours. For high-risk patients (score 5-7), the score supports an urgent invasive strategy (angiography within 24 hours), intensive antithrombotic therapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor (ticagrelor or prasugrel) in addition to aspirin and anticoagulation, and close monitoring in a cardiac care unit. The score has also been shown to predict long-term outcomes beyond 14 days, including 1-year mortality and recurrent ischemic events, thereby providing prognostic information relevant to both acute and chronic management planning. Despite the emergence of newer risk scores and biomarkers, TIMI UA/NSTEMI remains widely used due to its simplicity, rapid calculation, and robust validation across diverse patient populations and clinical settings.

Low Risk0–2

14-day event rate (death, MI, urgent revascularization): 4.7%.

Management: Observe in telemetry. Serial troponin and ECG. Consider stress testing if no recurrence.

Moderate Risk3–4

14-day event rate: 12.5%.

Management: Admit. Cardiology consult. Anticoagulation + antiplatelet therapy. Consider early invasive strategy within 48 hours.

High Risk5–7

14-day event rate: 29.3%.

Management: Urgent cardiology consult. Early invasive strategy (angiography within 24h). Anticoagulation (UFH/LMWH). Dual antiplatelet therapy (ASA + P2Y12 inhibitor).

Reference Ranges

PopulationNormal RangeNotes
UA/NSTEMI patients (TIMI 11B / ESSENCE trial populations)0-7 pointsEach point increments 14-day event risk by approximately 4-5%.
Dr. Khaled Hassan

Dr. Khaled Hassan

MD, FACCCardiology

Dr. Khaled is a cardiology consultant with 20 years of experience in managing cardiovascular patients.

View medical review board & editorial policy →

Example Calculation

A 68-year-old man with a history of hypertension (on lisinopril 20 mg daily), type 2 diabetes mellitus (on metformin 1000 mg twice daily, HbA1c 7.8%), hyperlipidemia (on atorvastatin 40 mg), and a prior inferior wall myocardial infarction 3 years ago treated with drug-eluting stent placement presents to the emergency department with acute-onset substernal chest pressure radiating to the jaw, associated with nausea and diaphoresis. The pain began 4 hours ago while at rest and he has experienced 3 similar episodes over the past 24 hours, each lasting 15-20 minutes. He takes aspirin 81 mg daily. Vital signs: BP 155/92 mmHg, HR 96 bpm. ECG reveals 1 mm ST-segment depression in leads V4-V6. Initial troponin I is elevated at 2.5 ng/mL (normal <0.04 ng/mL). TIMI UA/NSTEMI score calculation: Age ≥65 years (1 point), ≥3 CAD risk factors — hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia (1 point), Known CAD — prior MI and stent (1 point), Aspirin use within past 7 days (1 point), Severe angina — ≥2 episodes in 24 hours (1 point), ST-segment deviation ≥0.5 mm (1 point), Elevated cardiac markers (1 point) = Total Score 6 out of 7, placing him in the High Risk category with a 29.3% risk of death, MI, or urgent revascularization within 14 days. The patient is immediately started on dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin 325 mg load + ticagrelor 180 mg load), anticoagulation with enoxaparin 1 mg/kg subcutaneously, and a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor is considered. Urgent cardiology consultation is obtained for early invasive angiography within 24 hours.

Related Medications

Common Mistakes

Mistake

Applying TIMI UA/NSTEMI score to STEMI patients

Correction

This score is validated exclusively for unstable angina and NSTEMI. STEMI patients require immediate reperfusion therapy with primary PCI and should be managed separately using the TIMI STEMI risk score or direct catheterization lab activation.

Mistake

Not counting known CAD if the prior event was remote

Correction

Prior MI, PCI, or CABG at any point in the patient's history qualifies for this variable. Also includes known coronary stenosis ≥50% on prior angiography, regardless of whether it was revascularized.

Mistake

Counting risk factors incorrectly — using disease count instead of risk factor count

Correction

The score counts CAD risk factors (family history, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, smoking, obesity), not comorbid diseases. A patient with diabetes alone may not have ≥3 risk factors even if they have other medical conditions.

Mistake

Assuming a low TIMI score (0-2) means no risk of ACS

Correction

A low TIMI score still carries a 4.7% risk of adverse events at 14 days. It supports a conservative strategy but does not rule out ACS entirely. Serial troponin and clinical reassessment remain essential, and stress testing before discharge is recommended.

Mistake

Forgetting that aspirin use refers to the 7 days before presentation, not post-presentation

Correction

This variable captures pre-admission aspirin use, which identifies patients with more advanced disease who were already on antiplatelet therapy. It is not related to in-hospital aspirin administration.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between TIMI UA/NSTEMI and TIMI STEMI scores?
The TIMI UA/NSTEMI score is for unstable angina and NSTEMI patients and predicts 14-day composite events. The TIMI STEMI score is a separate system for ST-elevation MI patients who are candidates for fibrinolysis, using different variables and predicting 30-day mortality.
How often should the TIMI score be reassessed during hospitalization?
The TIMI score is designed for initial risk stratification at the time of presentation. It reflects baseline risk and does not change during hospitalization. However, clinical reassessment using dynamic markers (serial troponin, ECG changes, hemodynamic status) should guide ongoing management.
Does a high TIMI score always mandate urgent angiography?
While high-risk patients (score 5-7) benefit most from early invasive strategy within 24 hours, the decision must be individualized. Consider patient comorbidities, frailty, renal function, and patient preference. However, in the absence of contraindications, an early invasive approach is strongly recommended.
Can TIMI UA/NSTEMI score be used for patients with normal troponin?
Yes. Patients with elevated troponin automatically receive 1 point and are classified one category higher, but the score can still be calculated with normal troponin (score 0 for that variable). A patient with normal troponin but other risk factors may still be moderate or high risk.
Does the TIMI score guide antithrombotic therapy selection?
Yes. The score helps determine the intensity of antithrombotic therapy. Low-risk patients may be managed with aspirin and anticoagulation alone, while high-risk patients benefit from dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor) plus anticoagulation, and may be considered for glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors.
Is the TIMI score still relevant in the era of high-sensitivity troponin?
Yes. The TIMI score remains clinically useful even with hs-cTn assays. The biomarker component (elevated cardiac markers) is based on any elevation above the 99th percentile. Hs-cTn assays detect more NSTEMI diagnoses, which may actually increase the utility of the TIMI score in identifying higher-risk patients.

References

  • Antman EM, Cohen M, Bernink PJLM, et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: A method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. JAMA. 2000;284(7):835-842. PubMed
  • Cohen M, Demers C, Gurfinkel EP, et al. A comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin with unfractionated heparin for unstable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(7):447-452. PubMed
  • Morrow DA, Antman EM, Snapinn SM, et al. An integrated clinical approach to predicting the benefit of tirofiban in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2001;22(23):2154-2162. PubMed
  • Collet JP, Thiele H, Barbato E, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(14):1289-1367. PubMed
  • 2024 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes. Circulation. 2024.
  • Barthélémy O, Silvain J, Brugier D, et al. Predictive value of the TIMI risk score in patients with NSTEMI undergoing PCI. Am J Cardiol. 2009;104(9):1193-1198. PubMed
  • Pollack CV, Braunwald E. 2007 update to the ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2007;116(7):e148-e304. PubMed
Medical Disclaimer: This calculator is intended for use by healthcare professionals for educational and clinical decision support purposes only. It is not a substitute for professional clinical judgment.
Call Us
WhatsApp